Panarchy
Public.icon
In a paper from 1860, De Puydt first proposed the idea of panarchy. This is a political philosophy that emphasizes the right of individuals to freely choose (join and leave) any government jurisdiction without being forcibly moved from their current location.8 A supporter of laissez-faire economics,8 he wrote that such a system could exist simultaneously with "as many regularly competing governments as have been or will be thought of," and detailed how such a system could be implemented. As David M. Hart writes, "governments would become political churches, exercising jurisdiction only over congregants who chose to join."9 Similar ideas include the "functional overlapping competing jurisdictions" (FOCJ) proposed by Swiss economists Bruno Frey and Reiner Eichenberger, the "polycentric law" proposed by Le Grand E. Day, and the "meta-utopia" proposed by Robert Nozick in his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia.10 A world where everyone can be happy because all nations recognize "the freedom to leave the state"? A worldview where individuals move to countries that match their ideologies, as each country strives to become more popular by competing for human resources?
shogochiaishogochiai.icon is trying to realize this on alga worldline. https://gyazo.com/d5d222ef970e4d85343331cd789c81d9
Effective Altruism is also mentioned here...
Maybe it's time to do some proper research.
As a premise of the state, I have always thought that taxation and human rights protection are indispensable, but my way of thinking has been reversed since I got the idea of "public advocates carrying weapons of permissionlessness". Living with Nature 2.0 seems to be equivalent to belonging to a Panarchy environment in an efficient, strategic, and individualistic state.
Hypothesis: Efficient and strategic states will become almost unnecessary for taxation, and the era will enter Panarchy (a governance system in which multiple countries compete in one territory) whether they like it or not. https://t.co/HJbbkp1gfA I understand up to Resilience in the discussion of social-ecological systems, but I think Panarchy is different because there is too much imagination and not enough humility. Both "Resilience Thinking" and "Panarchy Synopsis" which are introductory books on resilience theory cannot be read in Japanese.